ActsETL Phase 6 revised reviewer wireframes

Design rule: Explore Acts remains full-width and sparse. Findings, QA focus, blockers and approval evidence live in the selected Act view. The reusable review grammar is preserved: evidence → investigation → advisory assistance → explicit human decision → reviewer-defined problem → remediation → recheck.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

Corpus

Explore Acts

128 transformed Acts in the current review corpus.

Act	Current state
Data Protection Act 2018 2018, No. 7	Not ready	Open Act
Planning and Development Act 2000 2000, No. 30	Not ready	Open Act
Road Traffic Act 1961 1961, No. 24	Eligible	Open Act
Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 2005, No. 10	Approved	Open Act
Example Act 1995 1995, No. 3	Processing failed	Inspect failure

Default corpus view: Act identity + one dominant state only.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsData Protection Act 2018Review Problem

A. Reviewer

← Back to Explore Acts

Data Protection Act 2018

2018, No. 7Run 418Not readyOpen eISB Act View transformed Act

OverviewFindingsQA focusApprovalHistory

Findings

Machine evidence for this run.

View findings

QA focus

3 mandatory · 4 advisory

View QA focus

Approval

Not ready

3 blocking conditions

Open approval summary

Suggested next actions

Address mandatory QA focus areas

Review current findings

Open blocking reviewer problem PR-23

Act-scoped hub: summary and navigation only; substantive conclusions happen in investigation/problem views.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsData Protection Act 2018Review Problem

A. Reviewer

← Back to Explore Acts

Data Protection Act 2018

Run 418Not ready

OverviewFindingsQA focusApprovalHistory

Current findings

Status	Location	Machine evidence	Review
New	Section 14(2)(a) `sec_14__subsec_2__para_a`	Schematron: missing required content eId	Unreviewed	Investigate
Persisting	Section 57(3)	Reference validator: invalid target	Reviewed	Open review
Gone	Schedule 1, paragraph 4	Previous structural warning absent in Run 418	Needs recheck	Recheck

Findings remain factual machine evidence; they are not semantic problem categories.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsData Protection Act 2018Review Problem

A. Reviewer

← Back to Explore Acts

Data Protection Act 2018

Run 418QA policy v1.2Not ready

OverviewFindingsQA focusApprovalHistory

QA focus is attention guidance. Mandatory recommendations require a durable investigation outcome. Advisory recommendations inform reviewer judgement but do not independently block approval.

Mandatory

Location	Why surfaced	State
Section 14	Complex modification structure; fallback transformation path used.	Outstanding	Investigate provision
Schedule 1, Part 2	Deep nesting and cross-reference density.	Outstanding	Investigate provision
Section 57	Matches a previously confirmed problem shape.	Addressed	Open conclusion

Advisory

Location	Why surfaced	State
Section 29	Unusual source structure.	Not reviewed	Investigate provision
Section 33	Long provision with multiple semantic paths.	Not reviewed	Investigate provision

No separate “QA checked” state. Acceptable transformation is the positive durable conclusion; identifying a problem also addresses the recommendation itself.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

QA focus · Mandatory · complex modification structure

Data Protection Act 2018, section 14(2)(a)

Run 418Result 1 of 3 mandatory QA itemsPrevious Next Open eISB section View transformed section Raw XML & provenance

Source provision

14. (2) The Commission may...

(a) require the controller to...

“having regard to the circumstances...”

Show containing section

Generated Akoma Ntoso

14. (2) The Commission may...

(a) require the controller to...

“having regard to the circumstances...”

Show modification hierarchy

Investigation notebook

Working notes and comparison trail

Working notes and AI suggestions are not durable conclusions unless explicitly recorded.

AI suggestion

advisory

Section 52 has a similar modification hierarchy but took the standard transformation path.

Compare

Observation

working note

Generated hierarchy appears consistent with source after expanding containing section.

14:21

Record reviewer conclusion

Acceptable transformation Source-caused issue New problem identified Existing problem Reviewer observation onlyRecord conclusion

Reusable review grammar: subject + evidence/provenance + comparison + advisory assistance + explicit durable human decision.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

Reviewer problem PR-23

Nested modifications lose target hierarchy

In certain nested modification structures, generated AKN flattens the target hierarchy and changes the intended legislative structure.

IdentifiedBackloggedReady for recheckVerified

Supporting occurrences

Act	Provision	Run	Review
Data Protection Act 2018	Schedule 1, Part 2	418	Problem confirmed	Investigate
Finance Act 2025	Section 10(1)(a)	418	Problem confirmed	Investigate

Counterexamples and exploration

History

10 Aug — Backlogged by A. Reviewer.

9 Aug — Created from Data Protection Act 2018, Schedule 1.

Reviewer-defined problem remains the remediation/recheck unit and is deliberately reusable beyond transformation review.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsData Protection Act 2018Review Problem

A. Reviewer

← Back to Act overview

Approval summary

Data Protection Act 2018Run 418QA policy v1.2

Not ready for approval. Three current blocking conditions must be resolved.

Blocking conditions

Type	Reason
Mandatory QA	Section 14 has no durable investigation outcome.	Investigate section 14
Mandatory QA	Schedule 1, Part 2 has no durable investigation outcome.	Investigate Schedule 1
Reviewer problem	PR-23 remains Backlogged and blocks approval under policy v1.2.	Open PR-23

Advisory QA

4 advisory recommendations remain. These do not independently block approval.

Review advisory QA recommendations

Not ready is system-derived; the reviewer never manually changes eligibility.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsRoad Traffic Act 1961Review Problem

A. Reviewer

← Back to Act overview

Review for approval

Road Traffic Act 1961Run 418QA policy v1.2

Eligible for approval. All policy-defined blocking conditions are satisfied. This does not approve the Act automatically.

Mandatory QA

3 of 3 addressed

2 acceptable transformations · 1 problem identified and successfully rechecked

Review evidence

Advisory QA

2 not reviewed

Advisory items do not independently block approval.

Review advisory items

Optional final references

Open transformed Act in new tab · Open source Act on eISB in new tab

Approval decision

Optional approval note

Approve transformed Act

Eligibility is the system gateway; approval is the explicit named-reviewer decision.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

← Back to Explore Acts

Add Acts

Search the available-Acts catalogue and select legislation to retrieve and transform.

Act name or title

Year from

Year to

Results

	Year	No.	Act
	2025	34	Finance Act 2025
	2024	43	Finance Act 2024

1 Act selectedContinue

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

← Change selection

Confirm Acts to add

Retrieval and transformation will not begin until you confirm this resolved selection.

Year	No.	Act
2025	34	Finance Act 2025

Retrieve and transform Cancel

Transformed Act reference

Contents Previous Next

Run 418 · exact transformed output

Read-only reference view

Data Protection Act 2018

Rendered from generated Akoma Ntoso · Run 418

Section 14 — Powers of the Commission

14. (1) The Commission may, for the purposes of performing its functions under this Act, require...

(2) Without prejudice to subsection (1), the Commission may—
(a) require the controller to provide such information as may be specified...

(b) take such other measures as are authorised by this Act.

Back to contents

Supporting reference surface only: no findings, QA controls, problem management, AI suggestions or approval actions.