Explore Acts — discovery/data grid
Dense triage surface for findings and processing outcomes, while preserving routes to all transformed Acts and acts with no findings.
Explore evidence
| Status | Act / location | Machine evidence | Review | Problems | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ☑ | New | Finance Act 2025 (34)sec_10__subsec_1__para_aeISB s.10 ↗ | Schematron · missing required eId | Unreviewed | — |
| ☐ | Persisting | Example Act 2022 (12)sec_4__mod_1__para_aeISB s.4 ↗ | Reference validator · invalid target | Reviewed | PR-17 |
| ☐ | Gone | Example Act 2024 (8)sec_7__subsec_2eISB s.7 ↗ | Previously: hierarchy mismatch | Reviewed | PR-09 |
| ☐ | Failed | Example Act 1995 (3) | Transformation stopped before validation | — | — |
Add Acts — catalogue selection and confirmation
Still part of Explore Acts. Catalogue browsing is separate from transformed-corpus discovery, but does not become a fourth primary workspace.
Selection comes from catalogue results; no special multi-Act submission syntax.
| Year | Act no. | Act name / title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☑ | 2024 | 18 | Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 |
| ☐ | 2024 | 12 | Finance Act 2024 |
| ☑ | 2023 | 39 | Finance (No. 2) Act 2023 |
| ☐ | 2023 | 11 | Finance Act 2023 |
Confirm retrieval and transformation
Nothing is retrieved or transformed until this resolved list is explicitly confirmed.
| Year | Act no. | Act name / title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | Finance (No. 2) Act 2024 | |
| 2023 | 39 | Finance (No. 2) Act 2023 |
Investigate Provision — expert comparison workbench
The dominant visual object is the source/output comparison. Navigation context, evidence, outcomes and AI assistance sit around it as compact expert tools.
10. (1) The Minister may...
(a) selected source material...
“Quoted amendment material...”
(b) further provision text...
10. (1) The Minister may...
(a) selected generated material...
“Quoted amendment material...”
(b) further generated text...
Review Problem — case-management record
A durable reviewer-defined record: lifecycle and priority are explicit, evidence accumulates below, and AI exploration/history remain supporting material rather than the organising model.
Quoted amendment target lost
Quoted amendment content is retained, but generated structure loses the target relationship needed to represent the modification correctly.
Examples and evidence
| Occurrence | Evidence | Review | |
|---|---|---|---|
Finance Act 2025 (34)sec_10__subsec_1__para_a | Schematron + observation | Reviewed | |
| Act 12/2022 · s.4 | Reviewer-discovered · no finding | Reviewed | |
| Act 3/2017 · s.9 | Conflicting conclusions | Disputed |
Observed when quoted material is nested inside a modification block; plain quotations outside modification structure appear unaffected.
Previous recheck failed. Run 401 still reproduced the problem and status returned to Backlogged.
Finance Act 2025 (34)sec_10__subsec_1__para_a
Act 21/2020 · s.5
Act 4/2016 · s.8
Act 7/2023 · s.11