ActsETL Phase 6 GOV.UK-disciplined workbench wireframes

Workspace 1

Explore Acts — findings, QA focus and complete-corpus navigation

QA focus is a distinct lens inside Explore Acts. Recommendations are not mixed into validator finding rows.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

Run 418

Explore transformed Acts

18 Acts · 127 current findings · 26 QA focus recommendations · 7 Acts not ready for approval

Findings and processingQA focusAll transformed Acts

Finance Act 2025 (34)
Run 418 · QA policy v1

Not ready
Approval eligibility

2
mandatory checks outstanding

1
independent blocking problem

Open approval summary

Provision	Why surfaced	Obligation	QA state	Review consequence
s.10(1)(a)`sec_10__subsec_1__para_a`	Quoted replacement structure with complex source/output mapping.	Mandatory	Not checked	Blocks approval until explicitly checked.	Investigate provision
s.87`sec_87`	Ambiguous Roman-marker hierarchy encountered during transformation.	Mandatory	Addressed Checked — review action required	PR-21 Backlogged · independently blocking	Open review
s.153`sec_153`	Unusually dense multi-term definition structure worth contextual checking.	Advisory	Optional guidance	Does not affect eligibility.	Investigate provision

Findings and QA remain distinct. A QA recommendation is attention guidance. If a QA check produces a reviewer problem, that problem follows its own lifecycle and may block approval independently.

Workspace 2

Investigate Provision — mandatory QA reached through the normal workbench

The source/output investigation stays unchanged. A compact QA requirement panel appears when the reviewer arrived from a mandatory recommendation.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

Compare the source and transformed provision

Finance Act 2025 (34), section 10(1)(a)

sec_10__subsec_1__para_aRun 418QA focus 1 of 4Previous Next Open eISB section Open rendered transformed Act Raw XML and provenance

Mandatory QA requirement · Not checked

Inspect this provision before Act approval

Why surfaced: quoted replacement structure with complex source/output mapping.

Opening or viewing this provision does not complete the requirement. Record an explicit outcome after inspection.

Checked — no further action required Checked — review action required

Source provision

10. (1) The Minister may prescribe...

(a) such matters as may be necessary...

“A person who contravenes this provision commits an offence.”

Show containing section

Generated Akoma Ntoso

10. (1) The Minister may prescribe...

(a) such matters as may be necessary...

“A person who contravenes this provision commits an offence.”

Show modification hierarchy

Drag to resize comparison and notebook

Investigation notebook

Working notes and comparison trail

Notebook material is exploratory until explicitly recorded as durable review evidence.

Observation
working note

Quoted material appears structurally plausible, but paragraph ownership should be checked against the source hierarchy.

Record as reviewer observation

AI suggestion
advisory

Compare with s.87 because both contain ambiguous nested markers.

Investigate

Normal review workflow

Record a reviewer conclusion

This remains separate from the QA-completion action above.

Continue

Act-level QA

Approval summary while Not ready

The reviewer can understand every blocker without the summary itself becoming a workflow-clearing screen.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

Act approval summary

Finance Act 2025 (34)

Run 418 · QA policy v1 · Not ready · Not approved

3 current blocking conditions

2 mandatory QA recommendations have not been checked.
Reviewer problem PR-21 is Backlogged and is approval-blocking under the active policy.

Mandatory QA

2 outstanding · 3 addressed

Review outstanding mandatory QA

Addressed checks remain visible with reviewer, time, outcome and exact run.

Blocking reviewer problems

PR-21 Roman provision ownership
Backlogged

The block clears when the problem is Resolved after reviewer recheck, or validly Retired.

Advisory QA

4 recommendations remain.

Optional guidance only. No completion action is required.

View advisory recommendations

Previous QA evidence

Run 401 contains 2 relevant prior checks.

Previously reviewed

Retained as context. It does not silently satisfy this run unless the active policy explicitly permits reuse.

Back to Explore Acts

Act-level QA

Final approval when Eligible

Eligibility permits approval; it does not make the approval decision.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

Approve transformed Act

Finance Act 2025 (34)

Run 423 · QA policy v1 · Eligible · Not approved

All current blocking conditions are satisfied. Eligibility means the system permits an approval decision; it is not a recommendation to approve.

What has been satisfied

All mandatory QA recommendations addressed.
All approval-blocking reviewer problems cleared.
Required evidence under QA policy v1 present.

Remaining advisory context

2 advisory QA recommendations remain.

1 non-blocking reviewer observation remains open.

Review advisory context

Exact output

Finance Act 2025 (34)
Transformation run 423

Open rendered transformed Act
Open source on eISB

Prior QA

Prior evidence from run 418 is retained in history.

Evidence reused for this run is explicitly identified; other prior evidence remains context only.

Approval is a named reviewer action. It applies to this exact transformed output and records QA policy v1.

Approval notes (optional)

Approve transformed Act Cancel

Repeat run

Renewed QA with prior evidence retained

Prior review is visible, but reuse is explicit rather than silently carrying completion forward when renewed QA is required.

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

QA evidence across runs

Finance Act 2025 (34), section 10(1)(a)

Previously reviewed on run 418.
A. Reviewer · Checked — no further action required. The current output is materially changed, so renewed QA is required. Prior evidence is retained for context.

Run	Evidence status	Reviewer action	Effect on current QA
418	Previously reviewed	Checked — no further action required	Context only unless policy explicitly permits reuse
423	Current mandatory check	Not checked	Blocks approval until addressed

Investigate current provision

Workspace 3

Review Problem — remediation lifecycle ends in Resolved

ActsETL Review

Explore ActsInvestigate ProvisionReview Problem

A. Reviewer

Reviewer problem PR-21

Roman marker assigned to wrong parent provision

Nested Roman markers can be attached to the wrong structural parent in transformed output.

IdentifiedBackloggedReady for recheckResolvedRetired

Supporting occurrences

Act and location	Evidence
Finance Act 2025 (34) `sec_87`	Originated from a mandatory QA check recorded as “Checked — review action required”.	Investigate provision

Recheck

A successful reviewer recheck moves the problem to Resolved. A failed recheck returns it to Backlogged and retains the failed recheck in history.

Corpus expansion

Add Acts — catalogue selection with confirmation

Add Acts

Choose Acts to retrieve and transform

Act name or title

Year or years

Known Act

Apply filters

	Year	Act number	Act name / title
	2025	34	Finance Act 2025
	2024	43	Finance Act 2024

1 Act selectedReview selected Acts